A mammoth scandal, the opportunity to speak truth to power, and a chance to see justice done for the victim of a horrible crime.
And what did the establishment media do?
They spiked the story.
The explanation of why creates more questions than it answers: Why did the reporter's superiors act as if it was a non-story? Why did it suddenly become more important for the network to have access to the British Royal Family, than for one of them to be exposed?
It's been said elsewhere that during Epstein's career, it was very dangerous to enquire too closely as to where he got his money.
But I'm left with one almost rhetorical question: If the media can be controlled by big money, why do we trust anything they say, ever?
No comments:
Post a Comment